![]() ![]() Slowly, one group at a time, she brought relatives with her out of the state, and eventually guided dozens of other enslaved people to freedom. In 1849, Tubman escaped to Philadelphia, only to return to Maryland to rescue her family soon after. These experiences, combined with her Methodist upbringing, led her to become devoutly religious. After her injury, Tubman began experiencing strange visions and vivid dreams, which she ascribed to premonitions from God. The injury caused dizziness, pain, and spells of hypersomnia, which occurred throughout her life. Early in life, she suffered a traumatic head wound when an irate overseer threw a heavy metal weight, intending to hit another slave, but hit her instead. In her later years, Tubman was an activist in the movement for women's suffrage.īorn into slavery in Dorchester County, Maryland, Tubman was beaten and whipped by enslavers as a child. During the American Civil War, she served as an armed scout and spy for the Union Army. ![]() After escaping slavery, Tubman made some 13 missions to rescue approximately 70 enslaved people, including her family and friends, using the network of antislavery activists and safe houses known collectively as the Underground Railroad. March 1822 – March 10, 1913) was an American abolitionist and social activist. "The employer provided no evidence of any losses they suffered because the employee failed to give three weeks’ notice," tribunal member Sarah Orr's decision said.įurther, in this case, the tribunal found there was evidence that the company had accepted Reyes' resignation, which meant it had "accepted the employee’s breach of contract.Harriet Tubman (born Araminta Ross, c. The company said the figure was equivalent to three weeks of Reyes' salary but – again – the tribunal found that the amount being claimed was not supported and so no damages could be awarded. was claiming $2,400 in damages as compensation after Wendy Reyes quit her job with two weeks' notice instead of the required three. The company provided "no evidence or submissions" about how it arrived at the $3,000 figure – which Rivers said could have included things like "records of the revenue" the employee brought in or evidence "from clients who chose not to do business with (the company) due to Mr. "Damages for breach of contract are generally meant to put the innocent party in the same position as if the contract had been performed as agreed," the decision explains. Rivers said, in his decision, that the issue of whether Mehta had breached the contract was ultimately irrelevant because the company had failed to prove its case. doing business as John Fleming Insurance Agency was asking the tribunal to compensate the company $3,000 after Davik Mehta, a broker, quit with no notice in 2022. Quitting without giving the required notice, the decisions say, can legally constitute a "breach of contract," making an employer eligible to sue for damages.īut – and this proved to be the deciding factor in each case – there must be evidence that the worker's departure resulted in the claimed damages. B.C.'s small claims tribunal has weighed in on two cases where an employer attempted to sue a worker who quit without providing the notice required by their contracts.ĭecisions in both cases were posted online Monday – and while the circumstances were different, the tribunal dismissed the employer's claims in both cases for the same reason. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |